Click to expand... Who said 1-B layers are alephs? Aleph 1 universes are low 1-C because Aleph 1 is the size of the continuum with continuum hypothesis. Basically 5D has Aleph 1 snapshots of 4D things. Similarly 6D had Aleph 1 snapshots of 5D things, aka Aleph 1 x Aleph 1 snapshots of 4D things. And so on for any number of dimensions. Aleph 1 x Aleph 1 x Aleph 1.... don't reach aleph 2 unless the number of terms themselves are aleph 1, which is why low 1-A is a higher aleph(aleph 1 dimensions which means aleph 1 terms in the product so overall Aleph 1^Aleph 1 or Aleph 2 in terms of universes) Basically switching from dimensions to universes only makes the difference of one aleph, and aleph omega is(in a simplified way) aleph infinity, so the difference of one aleph being displaced won't matter.

It might be confusing since the Tiering System FAQ doesn't really explain the reasons why aleph-2 space would be strictly larger than aleph-1 regardless of what its elements are (no disrespect to Ultima). Beth-1 (aleph-1 equivalent in continuum hypothesis) already defines the Euclidean space of R^n or say, dimensional spaces in layman's terms, that each of them contains beth-1 snapshots of their lower dimensions, respectively. Like beth-1 points makes up length (R^1), beth-1 lengths makes up width (R^2), beth-1 widths makes up height (R^3), and so on. Their cardinality won't increase whatsoever so more dimensions you're stacking because in order to reach R^R, you need beth-2. So therefore, aleph-2 space is Low 1-A aka aleph-1 dimensions equivalent. Isn't that what you're trying to say, @Darksmash?