What is reality? Is something you live in? Is it a house? Or is it your body for the microbes? Or is it something that has space-time? Or it something that has stars and planet? What is reality for a microbe? What is reality for a human? What is reality of a sentient universal space-time continuum who has the name Johnny and has really jolly personality and likes to sing cosmic saxophone, or that individual concept, is it functionally different from a concept of normal universe ? What if a human is so fat that his girth extends throughout the universe..... is that a concept which governs reality or something individual? What is personal reality? What is individual reality? Greater reality? Lesser reality? How do you even define such stuff which is so perspective dependent and subjective? And can anyone even give me examples of concept that governs reality?? As far as I know there's only one concept with governs ""reality"", which is.... Concept of Reality.. unironically... the scope of which is so dependent on each different verse and perception. I see concept of gravity and space or time being called concepts of reality... which makes me wonder if Gravity = Reality or Space = Reality etc. I can genuinely understand understand how on a casual view it can seem gravity or forces etc can affect reality when altered... but that doesn't make their concepts "govern reality".. because it's chain reaction. Something that we don't allow for conceptual manip. What about population? Does concept governing one star lesser than concept governing all stars in a universe? Does number of objects under a concept's government affect the concepts type? All of this makes me realise its the most arbitrary factor to apply to concepts... it throws away actual nuance in favour of made up overcomplexity. Type 1 and Type 2 concepts can be defined without all of this hassle with a simple factor.... dependency. Is/are the object/s and/or phenomenon/s intertwined with concept which governs it/them? Or are the concepts independent of object/s and/or phenomenon/s under their purview? Literally that's all you have to look out for. No range, no size, no population etc, nothing bogging down the classification of concepts. While I understand concepts often overlap and intertwine with each other for even governing a single object... but damnit we don't need to make it anymore complicated than it already is. As for Type 3... i never understood why it even exists... afaik Information Manipulation already co-incides with this. It's redundant. Type1 and 2 is all we need.